<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>I Can See it For You Wholesale &#187; captions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nickshere.com/blog/tag/captions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nickshere.com/blog</link>
	<description>autofocus is for the weak</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 21:12:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Captions</title>
		<link>http://nickshere.com/blog/2010/02/19/captions/</link>
		<comments>http://nickshere.com/blog/2010/02/19/captions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 03:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[thinking about photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1/125]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[captions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickshere.com/blog/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m going to plagiarize myself here. This is reposted from the body of a reply I made to a comment over at 1/125. In theory, I respect the principle that an image should stand on its own, without a title or a caption or any information at all &#8212; just itself. In practice, however, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to plagiarize myself here. This is reposted from the body of a reply I made to a comment over at <a href="http://one125.net/post/384313400/open-swim-camp-hill-pittsburgh-2007-by-ross#disqus_thread">1/125</a>.</p>

<p>In theory, I respect the principle that an image should stand on its own, without a title or a caption or any information at all &#8212; just itself.</p>

<p>In practice, however, I almost always associate the lack of caption with &#8220;picture puzzles&#8221; and &#8220;fuzzygrams&#8221; &#8212; photographs that are basically about hiding something from the viewer and daring them to figure it out. If I show someone a photograph, I usually don&#8217;t want them wondering what it is, or where it is, or whether I shot it on film or digital, or analyzing the lighting &#8212; all the things I do when I look at an image that doesn&#8217;t have any information associated with it. That wondering gets in the way of just looking, and just looking is what I want the viewer to be able to do.</p>

<p>In other words, even though putting in a bunch of data makes for visual clutter and complications, it (in my experience as a viewer) makes the <em>experience</em> of seeing the photograph simpler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nickshere.com/blog/2010/02/19/captions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

