<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 180mm f/2.8 Nikkor-P v. 55-200VR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nickshere.com/blog/2008/04/27/180mm-f28-nikkor-p-v-55-200vr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nickshere.com/blog/2008/04/27/180mm-f28-nikkor-p-v-55-200vr/</link>
	<description>autofocus is for the weak</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulmarculescu</title>
		<link>http://nickshere.com/blog/2008/04/27/180mm-f28-nikkor-p-v-55-200vr/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>paulmarculescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickshere.com/blog/2008/04/27/180mm-f28-nikkor-p-v-55-200vr/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This post came as a revelation to me. Following your description of the experience you had with the 55-200mm, I may say that I’m heading towards the end of the honeymoon period with this lens. Even though I keep it on my camera most of the times (I only have another lens, the kit one), I’m starting to feel frustrated by exactly the issues you listed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My knowledge in lenses is minimal and your blog and also your posts in the D40/D40x group on flickr are very good personal inputs. So, reading this, I decided that I want the 180mm f/2.8 P at the price you found it. I’ll do my best in finding it around here (I live in Stockholm).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing this and please keep up the blog. Your experience is a valuable source of inspiration.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ah, I was about to forget, may I suggest to change the color/decoration of the links on the website, since they don’t stand out from the text and can be easily missed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers,
Paul&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post came as a revelation to me. Following your description of the experience you had with the 55-200mm, I may say that I’m heading towards the end of the honeymoon period with this lens. Even though I keep it on my camera most of the times (I only have another lens, the kit one), I’m starting to feel frustrated by exactly the issues you listed.</p>

<p>My knowledge in lenses is minimal and your blog and also your posts in the D40/D40x group on flickr are very good personal inputs. So, reading this, I decided that I want the 180mm f/2.8 P at the price you found it. I’ll do my best in finding it around here (I live in Stockholm).</p>

<p>Thanks for sharing this and please keep up the blog. Your experience is a valuable source of inspiration.</p>

<p>Ah, I was about to forget, may I suggest to change the color/decoration of the links on the website, since they don’t stand out from the text and can be easily missed.</p>

<p>Cheers,
Paul</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat</title>
		<link>http://nickshere.com/blog/2008/04/27/180mm-f28-nikkor-p-v-55-200vr/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickshere.com/blog/2008/04/27/180mm-f28-nikkor-p-v-55-200vr/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Also, don&#039;t sell it... you can&#039;t get enough for that lens to make it worthwhile. Leave it on the shelf and someday you might need/want it for something.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, don&#8217;t sell it&#8230; you can&#8217;t get enough for that lens to make it worthwhile. Leave it on the shelf and someday you might need/want it for something.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat</title>
		<link>http://nickshere.com/blog/2008/04/27/180mm-f28-nikkor-p-v-55-200vr/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickshere.com/blog/2008/04/27/180mm-f28-nikkor-p-v-55-200vr/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for posting this commentary. I have been happy with my 55-200 in outdoor settings with good light, but I&#039;m loving my other primes and you&#039;re really tempting me with this one!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Pat&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this commentary. I have been happy with my 55-200 in outdoor settings with good light, but I&#8217;m loving my other primes and you&#8217;re really tempting me with this one!</p>

<p>Pat</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

